Home / Services / Forensic Delay Analysis

What delayed the project, and whether it affected completion.

Method-based analysis of what delayed the project, when it happened, what caused it and whether it affected completion. The programme history is reconstructed from the available programmes and project records, material findings are connected to the relevant source information, and assumptions, reconstructed information and areas of uncertainty are identified expressly.

When this service is required

Typical situations

01

A completed project overran and the cause is contested

The parties disagree on what drove the delay to completion; a structured analysis is needed to establish the position from the records.

Retrospective
02

A claim or defence needs an analytical foundation

Commercial or legal teams need the underlying delay analysis before a claim, rebuttal or settlement position is developed.

Claim support
03

The programme records are large and complex

Many updates, revisions and events need to be reconciled into a coherent account of what actually happened.

Complex records
Scope & deliverables

Material findings connected to the underlying records

Answering: what happened, what caused it, did it affect completion

The programme history is reconstructed from the available information: baseline and progress programmes, site records, correspondence, photographs and logic files. A recognised method suited to the records and the question is applied, and material findings are connected to the relevant source information. Where information is reconstructed or incomplete, the assumptions, limitations and areas of uncertainty are stated expressly.

What you receive
  • Forensic delay report: method, findings and completion impact, fully sourced and exhibit-referenced
  • As-planned vs as-built mapping, visualised so non-planners can follow the causation
  • Delay event schedule: each event characterised, dated, attributed and assessed
  • Concurrency and float analysis where relevant to the delay question

Approach & controls

Recognised methods, selected with judgement.

The method depends on the records, the contract and the question. It is selected for suitability, explained clearly and justified by reference to the available information.

Delay analysis methodsTime Impact Analysis · Windows / time-slice · As-planned v as-built · Collapsed as-built
Supporting analysisCritical and longest-path assessment · Logic and constraint review · Float and concurrency assessment · Programme-version comparison

Technology-assisted workflows accelerate programme comparison and change detection across large record sets; automated findings are verified against the source records, and professional judgement determines causation and conclusions. See our approach.

Related casework

In practice

Case file / 01 · Adjudication

Extension of Time awarded in full at adjudication

Sector
Civils & remediation
Region
United Kingdom
Role
Independent expert

An independent retrospective delay analysis reconstructing actual progress and identifying the material causes of delay.

Outcome

The adjudicator preferred the analysis and awarded the assessed Extension of Time in full.

Case file / 03 · Retrospective analysis

EoT secured on a 580 km gas pipeline

Sector
Gas transmission
Region
W. Australia
Project
DN300 · ~580 km

A retrospective analysis on a long-distance linear project, drawing on time-distance techniques suited to moving work fronts.

Outcome

Significant Extension of Time relief secured, with a favourable settlement.

Q/01

Which delay method will you use?

The appropriate method depends on the question being answered, the contractual context, the timing of the assessment and the quality of the available records. We set out the options and the reasons for the selection before the analysis begins. See TIA vs Windows Analysis.

Q/02

Our records are incomplete. Can you still help?

Usually, yes. A structured review often identifies more support than teams expect, and shows where the gaps are. Where records are missing, an as-built can be reconstructed from what exists, with the reconstruction, assumptions and evidential limitations stated expressly.

Led byIonut Voinea
CredentialsRICS Certified Expert Witness · MCIArb
ExperienceMore than 20 years' experience

Start the conversation

Bring us the programmes and project records. We will assess what they can support.

Initial discussions are confidential and without obligation. Enquiries are acknowledged within one business day.