Home / Insights
Articles covering delay analysis methods, Extension of Time claims, concurrency, programme evidence and claims assessment, focused on the practical questions that arise on live projects, claims and disputes.
Articles are written by Ionut Voinea, Founder and Principal Delay Analyst, drawing on more than 20 years of construction planning and delay experience. They provide general technical information and do not constitute legal advice.
What a response needs to consider: the event relied on, the contractual process and notices, programme impact, causation and the supporting records, together with the response errors that commonly cause difficulty.
What the Protocol means by true concurrent delay, the distinction between concurrent events and concurrent effects, why timing and criticality matter, and why the contractual and legal consequences need separate advice.
Two recognised methods that answer different questions. The appropriate choice depends on the timing of the assessment, the available programmes, the quality of progress records, the contractual context and the intended use of the findings.
Have a project-specific question? An initial discussion can help identify the appropriate technical scope. Discuss your matter or run the Delay Claim Health Check.
Put the thinking to work
The appropriate next step depends on the project stage, the available records and the question to be answered.